I read two things this week that made me sad.
The first one was a reminder on a women engineers' mailing list, that December 6th was the anniversary of the École Polytechnique massacre. What massacre, you ask? I'd never heard of it, so I checked on Wikipedia:
The École Polytechnique Massacre, also known as the Montreal Massacre, occurred on December 6, 1989 at the École Polytechnique in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Twenty-five year-old Marc Lépine, armed with a legally obtained semi-automatic rifle and a hunting knife, shot twenty-eight people, killing fourteen (all of them women) and injuring the other fourteen before killing himself. He began his attack by entering a classroom at the university, where he separated the male and female students. After claiming that he was "fighting feminism", he shot all nine women in the room, killing six. He then moved through corridors, the cafeteria, and another classroom, specifically targetting women to shoot. He killed fourteen women and injured four men and ten women in just under twenty minutes before turning the gun on himself.
I had to look twice at that date. 1989 is the same year as the Loma Prieta quake, so I would have been in sixth grade, and I definitely would have been reading the news by then. How did I not hear about this before? Maybe the US news media doesn't care about Canada? And, how, in North America in the late 20th century, does someone grow up hating women? Ugh.
The second item was an article in the NYTimes, sent to me by a friend who is a lawyer in New York City. It seems that for about a year now, the elevators at the Bronx Family Court have been so bad that people wait for hours outside the courthouse, in lines that go all the way down the block:
In some cases, warrants have even been issued for people who are downstairs waiting for an elevator; judges know only that they are not in the courtroom, said Bill Nicholas, the assistant attorney in charge of the Legal Aid Society’s office at the court.
The judges have less trouble getting upstairs because they use a bank of elevators reserved for court personnel. The public is not allowed on those, and may not use the stairs because of security concerns. Among them, there are no cameras in the stairwells, and the narrow stairwells are impractical for small children or people pushing strollers. So they must wait.
I usually hate personal stories from random people in news articles (abuse of ad hominem!), but this one kind of broke my heart:
Bernard Wilkerson, a construction flagger for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, said his custody and child support case against his wife had been dismissed three times because each time he was delayed in line and missed a hearing. Each time he had to petition again to restart the case.
Now he carries the court clerk’s number with him, so he can phone in when he is downstairs. Even with the steady rain beating down on his coat, he said this morning wasn’t that bad.
He was standing only 20 yards from the entrance of the building. Even with the long line inside, he would probably be upstairs in about an hour, certainly less than two. The thought cheered him.
“Sometimes I arrive here and I am standing outside Law and Government High School,” he said, referring to the Bronx School for Law, Government and Justice several hundred yards away.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
and now, for the depressing post of the week...
Labels:
crime,
current events,
new york,
rants,
tech,
women
Posted by
Emily
at
11:57 AM
0
comments
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
body language
Yesterday, I somehow came across this article, which discusses several studies investigating possible connections between body language and likelihood of assault. It concludes that people with assertive body language are less likely to be chosen as targets for assault. One study in particular found that "men tend to select submissive women for exploitation". I found this conclusion especially interesting, since it directly contradicts the theory that women "ask for" sexual assault with provocative dress and/or behavior.
Labels:
crime,
info,
women
Posted by
Emily
at
2:53 PM
0
comments
Saturday, March 20, 2004
yay, we win! but will global entropy prevail?
President Chen has won re-election in Taiwan, by the slimmest of margins (~30,000 out of about 13 million votes). Of course, a la Florida, the opposition is demanding a recount. Apparently there were over 300,000 invalidated ballots, but the hypothesis is that they were due to a campaign which advised voters to go to the polls, but vote for neither of the candidates. Nevertheless, KMT supporters have stormed the election headquarters in Taichung. I was proud to hear that the Taiwanese people had remained calm during the voting process, even with the shooting one day before. It's too bad that yesterday's composure is being overshadowed by today's chaos, in the eyes of the world.
On an unrelated, and more depressing note, I was talking to a friend today about an article about a man who tried to extort $100,000 from Google using a computer program he had written as a threat.
She brought up an interesting point. The nature of crime has changed. Crimes are much more complex, making them harder to track down. I wonder how many financial scandals didn't happen because the perpetrators of the crimes were too smart and didn't get caught? It's possible to glorify Robin Hood and stealing to feed the poor, but how can you glorify the mutual funds scandal?
In fact, lots of things have changed. War is no longer the structured type of affair in which civilians are safe watching from the sidelines, and soldiers agree to break for the night. Authors love to write about medieval knights and chivalry, but will they want to write about atomic bombs and air-to-air missiles?
I read that a terrorist once said that the object of terrorism was to kill as few people as possible, as publicly as possible, in order to draw the most attention. The object of terrorism was a concrete goal, whether it be publicity for a particular cause, or the extraction of certain concessions. It often seems nowadays that there is no object to the terrorism; terrorists kill as many as possible, and they don't seem to want anything, except to kill, out of hatred.
It's as depressing as the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Is that what we're seeing, a kind of global entropy?
Labels:
crime,
current events,
philosophy,
politics,
taiwan,
terrorism,
war
Posted by
Emily
at
5:00 PM